Net Savoir

It’s Shit Like This, Android

Posted in gadgets, opinion, rant by smange on March 6, 2011

I have an HTC desire and I really do love it. Well, mostly. I love everything about my phone except the lack of space in phone storage. I had hoped Froyo would end my misery, by allowing me to move apps to the SD card, but it’s only helped a small amount. There’s just not enough app-makers who think it’s important to add App2SD functionality. And given the pitiful amount of memory on my phone, I am really limited to just the apps with App2SD.

I’ve known for a while that it’s really the compulsory Google, HTC and Orange apps that were really eating into my space, so I thought I’d make a spreadsheet to work out where all the space goes. Out of my supposed 120MB remaining after Android OS is installed, this is what I’ve got:

  • 17MB which has to be kept free (Otherwise nothing works – data syncs etc)
  • 17.75MB for basic data: Basic Contacts, Calendar, Settings, etc.
  • 33MB for Google Apps I can’t remove
  • 13.4MB for Orange Apps I can’t remove
  • 9.2MB for HTC Apps I can’t remove
  • 28.5MB is used very quickly if I enable any of the Social Networking features HTC are so proud of (like Facebook and Flickr contacts sync, showing a friend stream of Flickr, Twitter, Facebook contacts, enabling Twitter notifications, etc)
  • 1.5MB is left free for new apps (WTF?)

Obviously, I’ve worked out a few tricks. Uninstalling Adobe Flash updates scores you 10MB space. Disabling all the social networking features gets you nearly 30MB back. All in all, I can wrangle about 40MB for new apps that can’t be put on the SD card. But that’s a compromise – I’d really LOVE to be able to use those social networking features. That’s one of the bonuses of having a smartphone!

So, this explains why HTC Desire users bitch and moan when your app is bigger than 200kb and doesn’t have App2SD.

Anyway, after calculating which compulsory apps I used and which I just wish I could get rid of, I was left with these figures:

  • 24.25MB Compulsory apps I find useful (Or at least, would find useful If I were using the social networking features)
  • 31.35MB Compulsory apps I don’t use and can’t remove (without rooting).


In these compulsory apps, there’s gems from Orange like a Monopoly game demo using 3MB of space which won’t even let me play an entire game all the way through. Also, there’s an Orange app store and Orange Maps – as If the Google versions weren’t enough.  In fact, I don’t use any of the Orange apps. Add to this that Orange kindly got me a Froyo update 6 months after everyone else in the world, it leaves me feeling somewhat miffed at Orange for wasting my time and phone space.

From HTC and Google, there’s a 2MB Youtube app (which pre-Froyo was unnecessary since the Youtube Mobile site is so good – why do we need it now?), a 1MB flashlight, a 1MB calculator. All of these have better, smaller alternatives available, but I can’t get rid of the stock versions.

I’m constantly removing apps so I can try new ones. I search for smaller apps and apps with App2SD. I clear my caches and user data regularly. But to think that over 30MB of space is used with apps I just don’t even want is ridiculous. Plus, out of the remaining 25MB of compulsory apps I do use (even if they’re not all essential to me) – not one of them can be moved to the SD card. Why? Oh, they’re probably worried I’ll remove it. Guys, I’ll put it on the SD card if I have a choice. But if I have no choice I might find myself rooting my phone and removing it.

So, Android. A couple of requests:

  • Stop letting phone providers add bloatware which can’t be removed.
  • Make your own essential apps App2SD!

So, after that rant and a realisation that my idea fix is not likely any time soon, I’m just one step closer to rooting my phone.

Feeding Facebook – About those bloody Twitter updates

Posted in debate, opinion, rant, social networking, trends, web2.0 by smange on October 28, 2009

Image Credit: MagerLeagues

Right. Time to get stuck in to a topic that hits a lot of nerves: Why some people import Tweets into Facebook. I’m not trying to start a debate here, rather to cast light on why some choose to do this.

Firstly, I’ll mention that due to Facebook changing the news feed, Twitter and Google getting friendly and Twitter introducing lists, both services are currently undergoing a bit of change. This means that users of both (especially those sending tweets through to Facebook) will be making adjustments. For starters, tweets get indexed by Google and Twitterers might have more luck keeping track of their real friends (thus also negating two of the main reasons for things like “Daily tweet” digests).

Anyway, there’s plenty of people wondering about the differences between the two services and what sort of status update goes to where. Danah Boyd also had a rant recently about the difference in status updates between Facebook and Twitter status updates. There are definitely differences between the two in regards to audience and conversation.

When I tweet it goes to thousands of people – some who are followers, some who see RTs and some who are searching hashtags or words. That audience is largely professional in nature. It’s public, immediate and it’s instantly part of a larger conversation. Twitter is about what’s happening throughout the world. It’s about news, thoughts, ideas, conversation and random funny things – but it’s also about everyone. You see humanising snippets of lives that remind you that you’re talking to real people. It’s the world talking to the world. People dip in and out as it suits them, talking to whoever is interesting or on-topic while they’re there. You miss some things and you catch others – It’s not important. When I’m online I see Twitter updates via Growl, constantly showing me interesting new stuff. Twitter is ubiquitous information gathering. Twitter is ephemeral. Twitter is about NOW.

Facebook is, due to the reciprocal friending practices, all about friends. Real friends. Yes, some people have also friended contacts and networkers as well as their friends. But largely, it’s about real friends. It’s like a one-stop shop for friend info. Facebook seems to be trying to branch into the worldwide-info market as well, but that’s not the point. For now, Facebook is the go-to place when you want to find out what your real friends have been up to.

I have no idea what you’re up to these days – you never post to Facebook.

I have to admit, when I first saw people bringing tweets into Facebook I was thinking “You’re doing it wrong!”. It still irks me that the Twitter app doesn’t work like it used to any more. The official Twitter app used to bring your tweets into your wall sweetly with a little Twitter logo. It was part of the news feed and if people didn’t want to see it they could just hide stuff from that app. But the app doesn’t work like that any more and none of the current working apps seem to do that – they all post as a status update. So, it was a big decision to cross the line and become an evil Twitter-Facebook crossposter.

Now, across many social networks I maintain separate information. Each network serves its purpose and has a different audience. I wanted to keep Facebook as a separate social network and not to replicate information – duplication is annoying! But the point is, Facebook is different for two very important reasons. Firstly, because information created in Facebook is largely stuck in Facebook (unless you can find the magic RSS feed) – it’s a walled garden. That doesn’t encourage people to create original content in Facebook. Secondly, because it really is the one-stop shop for friend info. Not many of my Facebook friends bother to follow RSS feeds – especially not now that Facebook is the place to go for friend info. And why would they go to Friendfeed and set up an account there, when they really want to see everything in Facebook with everything else? So, it’s up to me to make sure that all the stuff they might like to know about me is in Facebook where they’ll find it. In that respect, I’m treating Facebook as a lifestream. In goes a selected stream of stuff I do online, picked for relevance to my real-life friends. This is the general mentality of the people importing tweets and RSS feeds into Facebook. We have simply started to see Facebook as more of a lifestream for friends.

I’m actually quite glad that so many of my Twitter friends import their more interesting tweets into Facebook. If they didn’t I’d probably never see them. Even when I’m actively following Twitter I tend to miss things said by my own friends. This makes sure I don’t.

As for content, I guess it’s a constant adjustment to ensure just the right stuff is coming through. Twitter can get pretty chatty and it would be crazy to update your Facebook status that often. Some speak of Twitter as a mind-state versus Facebook as a life-state. That’s true for some. And for some, it’s only true sometimes. Humans are a pretty diverse mob. But for me, whether it’s something interesting I thought, saw, read or did, the final decision to send it to Facebook is largely about whether I think any of my friends will be interested. Also, since I don’t yet have an iPhone (or in fact a phone with internet or email access), I can’t update my Facebook status when I’m out and about. I can, however, send an SMS to Twitter and have it go through to Facebook if it’s relevant to my Facebook friends. So, Twitter is essentially the best path to get information from me to the internet at large. In that sense, things that I might have posted purely to Facebook are travelling through Twitter as well.

If you’re reading this and still all riled up that your friends are posting things to Facebook and it’s all just getting too much, I have an idea for you. Create a Facebook friends lists for “People I don’t follow elsewhere” and filter out the noise. Or just follow them via Facebook.

The point of all this is that there are many people out there who have realised that Facebook is where people go to find out about friends and that if we’re to supply these friends with the information they’re looking for then it’s best put on Facebook by us. There’s no point expecting people try to keep track of their own friends – we just have to take the information to where they’ll read it.

Image Credit: MagerLeagues

Twitter says “Hello Mikeyy”

Posted in ideas, opinion, rant, report, security, social networking, trends by smange on April 13, 2009

Watching Twitter at the moment is quite interesting as the Mikeyy worm is going around for the fourth time. TechCrunch has an update on how to get rid of it, but the gist is “Change your url, bio & hex colours, then log in/out and clear cache/cookies. To avoid infection, don’t look at people’s profiles in Twitter. Don’t follow any shortened links as they often point to infected profiles. “

Sadly, for the people who have an infection in their username, they are probably going to lose their username if they change their url. I hope they can get their names back later.

There are other interesting things afoot. Mikeyy very recently posted his phone number and said Twitter should hire him. Perhaps this is true – it can be very sensible to hire the people who know how to hack your system. But Twitter users are starting to suggest calling this number en masse as a form of internet vigilantism. Could get messy.

But, what I find really interesting is that Twitter can’t seem to fix this in any hurry. Mikeyy obviously isn’t malicious. He has power over a lot of accounts right now and isn’t doing anything too nasty (yet). But he has the potential to turn nasty and wreak havoc for Twitter. But, Mikeyy is just the warning. I bet a whole heap of nasty people are watching this worm with glee and planning their evil takeover.

Worse still, what if the super-nasties make their worm look just like Mikeyy? What if the response is a lot of people going “Don’t worry, just log out and clear your cookies” when it’s actually a far more serious threat?

Another clean (feed) limerick

Posted in debate, limerick, opinion by smange on November 17, 2008
No Clean Feed
Image by trib via Flickr

A silly old country down under
will filter the net all a-sunder
which many don’t know
will ruin the show.
They won’t see they truth ’til it’s plundered.

A clean (feed) limerick

Posted in debate, limerick, opinion by smange on October 17, 2008
Sensual lips.

Image via Wikipedia

There once was a country down South
which thought that the net was un-couth
they filtered the porn
which many did mourn
but now voices don’t have a mouth.

.. And the magic 8-ball says

Posted in apps, essay, feature, gadgets, ideas, opinion, rant, trends, web2.0 by smange on October 6, 2008

Christian Heldt, licensed by Creative Commons
Will iPhones take over the world?
.. And the magic 8-ball says: Hmmmmm… Outlook good.

Well, iPhones and millions of similar phones trying to achieve the exact same thing will take over the world.

It seems only yesterday I began to wonder how I would live without a mobile phone. Now it seems I’m handicapped by not having an iPhone or similar, with me wherever I go.

Image representing iPhone as depicted in Crunc...
Image by via CrunchBase

Internet and phone technology is converging so rapidly that they’ve nearly swapped places. I use my phone to update Twitter and my computer to make VOIP phone calls.

It’s all to do with timeliness and price. There’s no point telling twitter “Hey, I went to a great place this afternoon.” Twitter is about NOW. You want to be saying “Oh wow. I”m at this huge castle and it’s fantastic!”. You’ve got to stay current. Plus, you’ve got to give those cubicle-dwellers something to be jealous about.

As for phones, who would pay commercial rates when you can pay AU$15/month to call anywhere in the world via Skype? That’s cheaper than the line rental on most landline phones. As long as you can get your internet access without needing a landline, you’re pretty much set*.

But it’s even more involved than just this. People are posting audio blog posts via mobile phone, iPhones and Blackberrys let people easily** check email, bank accounts, social networks and just about any other website. So, the conversation is not just one-sided anymore. People stuck in bars can conveniently talk to their real life friends online while they wait for douchebag real-life friends to turn up late. All this rather than talking to the hottie at the bar. It makes so much sense now that I put it that way.

Pointlessness aside, this really means that people can stay somewhat mentally connected while physically roaming the world. No more Saturday nights staying at home waiting for the phone to ring – oh wait, that’s the 80′s. No more Saturday nights at home messing around on Facebook! Time to get out there and live a little!

* Although Skype do state that they are not a replacement for a real phone and should not be relied upon for emergency calls. So, keep a mobile handy.
** It’s true that you can do this on old clunkers too, but it’s just EFFORT.

Tagged with:

Barcbles has *got* to be a word, right?

Posted in apps, haiku, humour, opinion, social networking by smange on October 3, 2008
The board of the deciding game in the World Sc...
Image via Wikipedia

I love to play games
To use my brain is a joy
Heart Facebook Scrabble.

Arrr, but I’m not a pirate!

Posted in debate, education, how-to, ideas, intellectual property, music, opinion, rant, social networking, trends by smange on October 3, 2008
iTunes
Image via Wikipedia

Copyright material is, on the whole, controlled by companies who are still stuck in the dark ages. They want to maintain the rights and ownership forever – even when you purchase a physical CD!

These companies are clearly not listening to what the customers and the artists want. Which is a great shame for them, as there is a potential for big money for them if they take notice.

What customers want:

  • Cheap products
  • Near-instant availability
  • Quality products
  • Ample choice
  • Permanent ownership rights

That’s pretty much it. I’m sitting around late on a Monday night and I remember that track I heard on the radio this morning. I search for the snippet of lyrics I can recall, work out what song it is and who it’s by. I then want to own it. I’m quite happy to pay $1 for it. But I want it NOW. I want it on my iPod and I want to listen to it tomorrow when I go out. I also don’t want to get screwed over when I reinstall Windows or upgrade iTunes. I want to own the track and for that to be it.

The same goes for movies and TV. I don’t want to wait until show x is on TV. I’m not rearranging my social schedule to watch TV. No-one owns VCRs anymore and I’m not rich enough for a set-top box that can record. Hell – I’m a student. What I want is to be able to download the movie or next season of the show that I’m in the mood for that night. I’m willing to pay a bit. Maybe $5 to hire or $10 to own. But I want it NOW, in good quality and for it to be mine forever (except if I was hiring). No games – that just won’t hold with me.

So, okay. Let’s see what the artists want:

  • Exposure (especially to the right audience)
  • Some income (sometimes more)
  • Fans who will come to their gigs

Seems to me that making it easy for fans to get hold of their stuff would benefit them a great deal. Just think of all those late night $10 impulse-buy spends by teens who are desperate to be up with the next big thing.

Right. That’s settled. So, what about the labels and studios. What do they want?

  • Lots and lots of money
  • To have control over everything forever and ever
  • To get paid every time someone hums a tune

Well, something’s got to give. Face it. They don’t really have control at the moment, which is why they’re in uproar about filesharing. It’s time to try something new.

For starters, they need to get music, TV and movies online ready to be purchased before they start hyping them. This also means you need to have TV ready to download at the same time as it’s aired on TV. Any later than that and half of your potential paying customers just downloaded it for free from someone that taped it digitally and stuck the torrent up as soon as the show finished. You annoyed your fans by not having something they could buy, so they got what they wanted for free. These people might go and buy the box set down the track, but they’re not going to go back and buy a (possibly DRM controlled) digital copy a week later when you finally get it online.

This timeline goes for the whole world, too. Australians want to see the next episode of “Lost” just as much as the Americans. If they can’t buy it before that first torrent goes up then you’ve lost them. Here’s a thought: Let people buy the digital version BEFORE you play it on TV. Let TV be the second-best option for people who can’t be bothered forking out the cash. I am absolutely certain you will make more money this way.

I get the feeling that labels and studios could make many millions by offering the sorts of payment options tried and tested in other industries over the years:

  • Pay-per-view
  • Periodic rental (one day or one week)
  • Subscription with caps (either by size or by dollar value of the media)
  • Unlimited subscriptions
  • Subscription to a radio or video stream (sort of like TV)

There are many ways to stop people sharing the files once they’ve got them:

  • Digital signature (If I know my name and email address are encrypted in that file I won’t be giving it to anyone)
  • Time or usage-locks (such as the ones used by trial software – offer rentals in a special format that will only work with a specific player)
  • Prosecute the people who are sharing the material (rather than targeting the ones that download it).

The labels could be making a fortune by doing things right. Most pirating only occurs because people can’t buy what they want when they want it. They have products that the people want – let them have it!

Tagged with: ,
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.