Net Savoir

Socialmoth is now SpeedDate? WTF?

Posted in apps, news, rant, social networking, web2.0 by smange on December 25, 2008

It’s Christmas day and all of a sudden I get an email to say that my Facebook profile shows me as having a dating app on my profile. Seriously, how many people do you think will have a hard time explaining this to their spouses?

Thanks for using Socialmoth Secrets. We are excited to announce that, as of next week, Socialmoth Secrets’s name and functionality will be changed to SpeedDate. Data entered into the original app won’t be used anymore. Soon you’ll be able to try SpeedDate, the fastest way to meet new people, so stay tuned!
Thanks,
Socialmoth Secrets

P.S. If you want to opt-out of this app, instructions can be found here.

By the time I received the email the SpeedDate app was listed as one of my apps. It looks like what they’ve done in reality is to subscribe all Socialmoth users to their new app, SpeedDate, and then plan to delete the SocialMoth app in the next week.

I think Facebook should have a few more rules about what an application is allowed to do. Especially when it comes to changing the name and/or the fundamental nature of what the app is about. Socialmoth (which was kind of like Postsecret for Facebook) just changed to SpeedDate. Hell, Facebook doesn’t let people change the names of groups – even if they spell something wrong! Why should an app be allowed to change so drastically? Facebook should make apps stick to the same strict rules as groups.. or at least have their name change approved by Facebook.

The trick of subscribing all current users to a new app should also be banned.

Seriously.

I believe that by changing the name and nature of the application from SocialMoth to SpeedDate they have falsely represented themselves. I think this counts as a violation of the Facebook Application Developer Terms and Conditions. I strongly recommend that anyone who was a Socialmoth user reports both SocialMoth and SpeedDate.

Obituary for Pownce

Posted in humour, news, satire, social networking, web2.0 by smange on December 2, 2008
Pownce
Image via Wikipedia

A celebration of the life of Pownce, the niche social network which has now lost its battle for survival.

With Pownce officially leaving us for good on the 15th December, I thought it was time to share my thoughts on the life of Pownce.

Pownce was a quirky, geek-oriented social network. We loved it for its concentric circle theme and elegant simplicity. With privacy options that really worked, we adored that network with all our hearts.

We all believed that with Kevin Rose (of DIGG) at the helm it was destined for great things. But, alas, its life was cut short by a convenient sell-out.

Life really got exciting for Pownce in the middle of 2007, when Mashable ran a glowing feature article about the network. With further exposure, this period of time was the highlight of Pownce’s brief, glorious life.

The fans will certainly mourn the loss of such talent for years to come.

Pownce is survived by Vox, the preferred social network of Pownce’s parent Six Apart.

In lieu of flowers, please take the time to visit Vox and nurture the surviving sibling.

Is this news for real? 3-Step Check!

Posted in debate, education, ideas, media analysis, news, trends by smange on October 16, 2008
Brookgreen Gardens in P...
Image via Wikipedia

You’re faced with a vast sea of information on a daily basis. Some are reputable news sources and others are definitely not. But what about all those sources in between? How do you choose whether it’s believable or a complete waste of time?

Most people make these decisions without really analysing how it’s done. That’s great, because it shows you have good common sense, but it could still leave you suckered in by something one day.

Don’t fret! This decision really comes down to a few very simple points:

  • Credentials – How credible is the author? What authority do they have? What are the credentials of the publication? What do the peer reviews of the author or publication say? Does the publication have advertisements? Is the publication well organised?
  • Currency – How current is the source?
  • Content – How objective is the article? Is this primary or secondary content? Is this article written for a particular audience? Is it well written? Is it accurate? Does the article reference their sources? Are the sources reputable?

But, there’s value in the blogs and less reputable sources, too.

Newspapers, magazines, professional blogs and citizen journalists are generally considered to be a good source of:

  • current information
  • facts and details
  • excerpts and quotes, such as first hand accounts
  • reflection and analysis, showcasing what was important at the time of printing and how events were perceived.

So, there you go. It’s not that hard! Now you can continue to browse the internet for new info, armed with the knowledge of exactly what you should and shouldn’t believe from each site.

Welcome to Net Savoir

Posted in editorial, news by smange on September 2, 2008

Hi there. Welcome to the Net Savoir corner of the world. If you’re new around here, I recommend reading this so you know what it’s all about. Enjoy!

Ange.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.